Kyllä se fundeeraaminen olis suotavaa myös nykypolitiikoille

Nyt kun meillä on ollut reilun kaksi vuotta mietitään asiaa kunnolla hallitusta ne vaan ajetaan läpi hosumalla .

Olemme olleet ääri oikeiston repivässä politiikassa revitty joka suunnalta ja mielestäni monasti tuo fundeeraaminen olisi kyllä aivan asiaa .

Mutta kun kaikilla asioilla on kiire saada asiat läpi ennen  kun hallitus pohja vaihtuu no voihan ne sitten tosin purkaa .

Mutta paljonko nuot teot stten maksaa kansalle jos suoraan sanoo niin paljon mutta siitähän ei esim meidän pääministeri piitta vaan hosuminen senkun jatkuu .

Joskus epäilee onko meillä enää kepua vaan onko siitä tullut kokooomuksen puisto osasto no sen saatte itse miettiä elikkä fundeerata kuten Turussa sanotaan .

Maailma voi muuttua mutta hosumalla ei saa kun ???? mukuloita seomoro tepivaari Kirjoitti Teuvo Mast  

Katselukerrat: 207

Neuvos kommentoi_ 13. toukokuu 2017 18:49

Manu anto sen pressan vallan - niinettä enemmistöoikeistohallitus tekee mitä tahtoo eikä kukaan voi mitään ei edes pressa. Oikeisto rahakkaat vie ja kohta varmaan tuhkatkin pesästä. No saadaan me se valinnanvapaus? - Joka ei ole valinnanvapaus.

teuvomast kommentoi_ 13. toukokuu 2017 19:34

Sipilän vapaus onkin se joksi sen vapauden viimeksi kuulin Tammelan torilla terv tepivaari 

Seppo Muurinen kommentoi_ 13. toukokuu 2017 20:19

" Tiedä että onko nykyään enään aikaa fundeerata mutta tietty - Havukka-Ahon mietelmät ajansaatossa voisi olla hyvästä --- ähkyn rinnalla --- fundeerata ts. suunnitella/sovitella ajan kanssa".

Että oma lääkäri/hoitaja parina jokaiselle aina tarvittaessa ja helposti ..." vai onko tämä sitä toivio unta joka valuu kuin vesi hanhen selästä " ?

teuvomast kommentoi_ 13. toukokuu 2017 20:24

Kun tehtäs kerralla kunnollista niin se tulis halvemmaksi yhteiskunnalle kun hosumalla tehty ja moneen kertaan korjattava asia terv tepivaari 

Hapan Kaali kommentoi_ 13. toukokuu 2017 20:44

Kohtuullinen fundeeraus on paikallaan kunhan ei mene jahnaukseksi. Enemmän pitäisi suomalaisten myös diskuteerata, ottaa tässä asiassa oppia ruotsalaisilta. 

Veera kommentoi_ 13. toukokuu 2017 20:50

Juu, samaa ajattelen kuin Tepi, että politiikassa pitäisi enemmän käyttää harkintaa eikä hätiköidä. Lakimuutosten valmistelu pitäisi tehdä huolellisemmin ja miettiä tarkemmin muutosten vaikutukset. Ei ole hoppu hyväksi eikä kiire kunniaksi, sanoo sananlasku.

Risto Juhani Koivula kommentoi_ 14. toukokuu 2017 19:37

Tuskin kukan on fundeeraanut typerämmin kuin Manu:


It is a long story. He had studied from worker to sociologist, doctor of social sciences (not economist) and he started to work in banking sector in Finnish so called Red Capital, a co-opreative- based capital grpoup which was near Social Democratic and Communist parties and workers´ trade unions. That group had also important role in commercial and technological co-operation with Soviet Union, Eastern Europe and China. He was a director of Workers´ Sparebank, from which post he was taken to Minister of Finance in reformist government of Rafael Paasio, which made important reforms in Finnish society mostly according to Swedish Socialdemocratist model, but that was in Finland economically based on co-operation with Soviet Union for instance in oil trade and technology and heavy metal and forest industry (clearig ruble system).

He was never elected to Parliament or to leader of his party. Neither he was any father on those reforms: his party was the last in that "People´s front" to come to support them. But he could take honour and votes for his party, bacause many reforms were copied from Swedish Socialdemocrats, and bause he was a favourite of commercial media. In reality he was follower on German right-wing NATO-Social-democats. Once in about 1973 his men were caught by customs with big amounts of smuggled money from there for trade union elections.

At the end of 70-ies Social Democrats became biggest party in elections, and he was elected to Prime Minister, who is in Finland also automatically Vice-President (not party leader Kalevi Sorsa, who was also and more Euro-Sosialdemocrat of Socialist International).

When president Urho Kekkonen lost his health in 1982, Koivisto became first temporary President and then in elections President. He started to guide Finland away from co-operation with Russians and to European Union and NATO co-operation.

His nickname was Manu. The worst is, that he believed he is some kind of skillfull economist, an he srtarted "Manually" as it was said to "guide" economy and finances in the state, in the Red Capital which was led by him in "gray" methods (I was also wrking there in that time) and espesially in "labour market", where by him was developped a special Finnish model "Incomes politics", which was close to Benito Mussolini´s corporative state, where industrialsits´ unions and trade unions with representatives of goverment made "General Incomes Agreements" on wages, often prices, too, and social and other state services: health care, education, pensions, then "science" (started b******* science...) and so on. State "bought" trade market argeements forn employer unions with political solutions recommended by them.

The worst and most stupid were operations to connect Finland with European Union, especially to its finances, BEFORE politically accepted membership.

He "opened capital markets" to USA and Germany currenhcies (and others) AND NOT ONLY OPENED BUT "FORCED" FIRMS TO TAKE LOANS in dollars and German marks BY MAKING FOREIGN LOANS CHEEPER and demanding LESS QUARANTEES than loans in Finnish marks (applying illegal "state qurantee" to banks to sell foreign loans for Fiinnish firms and citizens).

They thought that that kind of sucking foreign currency to national markets WOULD NOT INFLATE FINNISH MARK (as printing more marks, lowering rents would do).

That was b*******: of cause it inflates national currency mark, because more money is brought to market, and Finnish market cannot inflate dollar or German mark!

They fixed Finnish currecy mark (markka) with European Union ECU which was agreement of EU states on fixed mutual courses between for instance French frange and German mark.

Firms took vane loans in foreign currency because they were forced to do so by jobbers, who took also currency loan (in illegal state qurantee for baks to give loan to anyane) and bought materials from the front of nose of such firms who dealed with Finnis marks (in real, not imaginary economy).

But that fix was boken. After some months it was taken back, and the mark had inflated 31% in taht time. Loans in currecy were at once 31 more than they wre yesterday, and that money must be earned in marks!

That made the special Finnish phenomenon "LAMA" in finald in early 90-ies to end of it. It was quite vane absolutely due to stupidity of Mauno Koivisto, Prime miniter Holkeri (right wing Kokoomus) and financeminiter, then EU Comissaar ERkki Liikanen, now still leader of Fiinsh Bank, a filial of EU Central bank.

teuvomast kommentoi_ 14. toukokuu 2017 20:02

Pelkät eri kielellä olevat poistan, syynä etteivät ihan kaikki silti ymmärrä näitä .

Ja vaikka itse sen ymmärsin se ei riitä silloin kun tuota ei kaikki ymmärrä tee suomeksi ja lyhyempi versio  .

Olipa ne Manun fundeeramiset kuinka typeriä joidenkin mielestä ne oli silti mietty eikä hosuttu lainkaan kuten nyt tupataan tekeen .

Suosittelen että poistat tuon kommenttisi ihan itse terv tepivaari 

Orwell kommentoi_ 14. toukokuu 2017 20:22

Kielirasismikin on rasismia...

teuvomast kommentoi_ 14. toukokuu 2017 20:43

Sellasta ei ole kun kielirasimi eikä tule oleekaan mutta porukassa on ihmisiä jotka ei voi kommentoid muulla kielelläkun suomi .

Jos joukossa on pätkiä eri kielellä lainauksina onkin sitten eri juttu mutta koko kommentti sitä ei voi olla ja kun koko kommentti on eri kielellä otan sen robotin tekemäksi .

Ja siksi ei toivotuksi terv tepivaari 

Kommentoi

Sinun tulee olla Aamulehti Blogit -verkoston jäsen ennen kuin voit kommentoida!

Liity verkostoon Aamulehti Blogit

© 2017   Perustanut: Aamulehti.   Toiminnon tarjoaa

Merkit  |  Ilmoita ongelmasta  |  Palveluehdot